By
Roage
Roage
Most people are unaware of the few flaws that changed our country into a tyranny. Those astute among us recognized the first Constitutional flaw in Article I section 8 Clause 17:
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
If you don’t see the flaw it lies in the fact that the District of Columbia qualifies as a nation and is ruled exclusively, not as a Republic, but a more dangerous form of Government, a democracy. They had all the power so in 1913 a handful of criminals created a corporation called the "United States of America". Anyone who claims citizenship to this little country is bound to all the legislative monstrosities that the Congress can enact. By simply saying the Pledge of Allegiance one voluntarily gives up their Constitutional Rights under the Republic in favor of Civil Rights that can be suspended at will. If one does not understand this principle then a study of real law is in order. (See: What are Rights)
That was the obvious flaw but there had to be another to allow Congress to subvert their oath of office. That was required because most take their oaths seriously and the oath, under God, is what assures the people, that those they elect, are bound to act in the people’s best interest. Most of you will be reading this for the first time. The next flaw in the Constitution is found here in Article II Section 1 Clause 8:
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
The other mention in the Constitution regarding the Legislative or Judicial branch’s oaths is a passing statement in Article VI Section 3:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
The actual oath that a congressperson affirms are found in these paltry 14/15 words:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.
This constitutes a more important flaw, and that is: in no way must the individual swearing or affirming, declare any prior oath, that nullifies their oath of office.
The next thing I say is true. The last thing I said was false. Swearing oath prior to their oath of office that nullifies their oath of office easily thwarts this duty.
It is obvious and self-evident that those, that we think are serving our Republic, are doing no such thing. The Internet is full of stories that push the absurdity of our Government to new heights.
Apparently many out there are dense and do not understand what I am saying here so let me make it perfectly plain:
The Constitution says any human being who serves in office: "shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation" That does not mean simply mouthing the words. They must do what they say they are going to do. They "shall be bound" and that means if they are not bound, and looking around, it is obvious they are not bound then they do not lawfully or legally hold office! More importantly if they do not hold office then any citizen is at liberty to penetrate their immunity of office at will, charge and arrest them. Better let your local Sheriff do it because it is their job, duty and they at least take their oaths seriously. Besides they will be happy to do so.
THAT MEANS THIS FARCE IS OVER TODAY!
One more time since the "President" is not bound to his oath he does not legally hold office and the only reason he has not been arrested is because everyone is letting him get away with it!
How do you catch them and turn this around now we are armed with this information? That is the easiest part. Those that serve in office are not traitors to the Republic because they have nullified their oaths. They are simply enemies of the Republic. They are imposters that we voted for that chose not to hold office in the Republic. They hold office in the corporation called the "United States of America". We the People are the supreme power in the Republic and it takes only twelve members of "We the People" and a judge to form a Grand Jury. A Grand Jury has all the power necessary to end this today.
How? With the subpoena power of a Grand Jury you swear in your enemy to testify with a better oath that allows no wiggle room and you ask him a simple question:
"Are you bound by your oath to support the Constitution of the United States?"
If he or she answers "yes" then they are traitors and you hang them. The evidence of their crime is self-evident and right out there in the public record for all to see. They have failed to support the Constitution. If they answer "no" then he or she is simply an imposter and if they have been party to any crime against the people then they are an enemy of the Republic. Since I have heard none of them recuse themselves after taking their oaths, they all have some hard choices to make. Do I want them all to hang? Nah, just a few of the rotten ones will do, like Chuck Schumer and he already knows why.
You could fill the trees in Washington with vermin and we would have our country back in short order, perhaps one afternoon maybe two. Most people would enjoy helping I am sure.
You see that is why our President can make a statement about the Constitution as: "just a goddamned piece of paper".
Well Mr. "President" as you, are so prone to overlook the obvious. It is not the paper the words are written on but what words are written on the paper. I think those words would have served us better if the were written on a long length of rope. Mr. "President" I will remind you that you serve at our leisure and not the other way around. You bring death and hardship on our Republic and its people and that will shortly come to an end.
The Supreme Court knows that if "We the People" stand for it and let it go then they are in no position do anything about it. They cannot do anything about it because they do not have that power. We do!
I love my Republic and am willing to die for it, but luckily, I won’t have to.
What do you say, is there one honest judge out there?
